Even if the studies are somewhat true, there is no need to enforce a universal ban on gas stoves. Just put out a notice to the population most affected and let them decide what to do. We don't need government telling is what to do when only a small percentage of people are affected!
all of the studies done by corporate or government funding are frauds. they start with conclusions and then fit/cherry-pick data points. usually name of institutions itself is givaway. consumer in name means anti-consumer interest.
100% correct. The whole catastrophic human-caused global warming was a UN enterprise that started from the premise CO2 from human activity was warming the planet. 'Here's a bunch of money. Now go forth and find evidence that supports that position. Please discard or suppress any contradictory data.'
Climate change has and will continue to occur as a natural phenomenon. CO2-driven climate change is not a thing. All the predicted disasters are the product of flawed computer models. One of my engineering professors showed how the programs are set up and the fatal flaw hardcoded into the software. It doesn't matter what the input variables are, the result is runaway warming. It started as global warming and when that failed to materialize, they switched it to climate change so it covered every eventuality.
Calling it nonsense is easy. I need to see your argument that CO2 from human sources drives global warming. Do you understand the premise for the runaway warming?
You should also consider contacting organizations like the Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers or even the National Association of Home Builders, who would be very keen to review your findings.
"The basis for this was a nine-paragraph paper that came out near the end of last month in the MDPI publication International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health." - Why do you believe that is an accurate statement?
The time has come to distrust whatever the "establishment" government is telling us! Too often we are discovering that what they say, or demand is not at all to our benefit, unlike what they insist. It is rather to an agenda's benefit! An agenda they are pushing and one that is very likely to enrich those doing the pushing.
Do you wonder who actually runs this whole Cremieux enterprise? A single person can not produce so many lengthy, detailed articles (and Tweets) in such a short time span. It may be some covert government branch, but my hunch right now is some libertarian group or "think tank".
Even if the studies are somewhat true, there is no need to enforce a universal ban on gas stoves. Just put out a notice to the population most affected and let them decide what to do. We don't need government telling is what to do when only a small percentage of people are affected!
all of the studies done by corporate or government funding are frauds. they start with conclusions and then fit/cherry-pick data points. usually name of institutions itself is givaway. consumer in name means anti-consumer interest.
100% correct. The whole catastrophic human-caused global warming was a UN enterprise that started from the premise CO2 from human activity was warming the planet. 'Here's a bunch of money. Now go forth and find evidence that supports that position. Please discard or suppress any contradictory data.'
Anthropogenic climate change is real and a problem. Catastrophic takes are wrong but I just want to clarify that climate change is a real issue.
Climate change has and will continue to occur as a natural phenomenon. CO2-driven climate change is not a thing. All the predicted disasters are the product of flawed computer models. One of my engineering professors showed how the programs are set up and the fatal flaw hardcoded into the software. It doesn't matter what the input variables are, the result is runaway warming. It started as global warming and when that failed to materialize, they switched it to climate change so it covered every eventuality.
Your comment is nonsense.
Calling it nonsense is easy. I need to see your argument that CO2 from human sources drives global warming. Do you understand the premise for the runaway warming?
Have you shared this with anyone at the CPSC? They have a public Request for Information posted now: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/03/07/2023-04554/request-for-information-on-chronic-hazards-associated-with-gas-ranges-and-proposed-solutions
You should also consider contacting organizations like the Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers or even the National Association of Home Builders, who would be very keen to review your findings.
"The basis for this was a nine-paragraph paper that came out near the end of last month in the MDPI publication International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health." - Why do you believe that is an accurate statement?
sorry for asking again, but do you have a place for contact?
No.
Say what?
Do you allow off topic posts in your comments section?
The time has come to distrust whatever the "establishment" government is telling us! Too often we are discovering that what they say, or demand is not at all to our benefit, unlike what they insist. It is rather to an agenda's benefit! An agenda they are pushing and one that is very likely to enrich those doing the pushing.
Do you wonder who actually runs this whole Cremieux enterprise? A single person can not produce so many lengthy, detailed articles (and Tweets) in such a short time span. It may be some covert government branch, but my hunch right now is some libertarian group or "think tank".